The effect of social network structures on trust: An analysis based on computer simulations and the evaluation of Coleman’s theory

Authors

  • Jose Ignacio García-Valdecasas Medina Universidad de Valladolid

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the impact of different social network structures and structural properties on the tendency to trust inside networks. To this end, a series of virtual experiments with artificial networks have been carried out using computer simulations. The results underscore the profound effect of the structural properties (network density, link globalization index and Gini index of the distribution of links) and type of structure (regular, random and small world) of social networks on the tendency to trust among the agents of a network. In addition, Coleman’s theory on the control and surveillance of young people is evaluated to study the data provided by the virtual experiments with the previous artificial networks.

Keywords

small world, clustering coefficient, Gini Index, virtual experiments, artificial networks, computer simulation, Coleman’s theory

References

Alesina, Alberto y La Ferrara, Eliana (2002). «Who Trusts Others?». Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6

Allison, Paul (1978). «Measures of Inequality». American Sociological Review, 43, 865-880. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094626

Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Nueva York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_7

Axelrod, Robert (1997). «Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Science». En: Conte, Rosaria; Hegselmann, Rainer y Terna, Pietro (eds.). Simulation Social Phenomena. Berlín: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03366-1_2

Back, István y Flache, Andreas (2006). «The Viability of Cooperation Based on Interpersonal Commitment». Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(1). Recuperado el 21 de mayo de 2017, de http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/12.html .

Barabási, Albert‐László (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033300

Boccaletti, Stefano et al. (2006). «Complex networks: Structure and dynamics». Physics Reports, 424, 175-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009

Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). «The forms of Capital». En: Richardson, J.G. (ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Nueva York: Greenwood. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15

Burt, Ronald S. (2004). «Structural holes and good ideas». American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787

Burt, Ronald S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21742-6_23

Burt, Ronald S.; Bian, Yanjie y Opper, Sonja (2018). «More or less guanxi: Trust is 60% network context, 10% individual difference». Social Networks, 54, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.12.001

Buskens, Vincent W. (1998). «The social Structure of Trust». Social Networks, 20, 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(98)00005-7

Buskens, Vincent W. (2002). Social networks and trust. Boston, Dordrecht y Londres: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/b109038

Carrington, Peter J.; Scott, John y Wasserman, Stan (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811395

Chow, Wing S. y Chan, Lai S. (2008). «Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing». Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007

Coleman, James S. (1988). «Social Capital in the Create of Human Capital». American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Coleman, James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Coleman, James S.; Menzel, Herbert y Katz, Elihu (1957). «The diffusion of an innovation among physicians». Sociometry, 20, 253-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785979

Cook, Karen S. y Gerbasi, Alexandra (2009). «Trust». En: Hedström, Peter y Bearman, Peter (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.10

Cruz Gómez, Irene y Verd, Joan M. (2013). «The strength of ties: A theoretical and empirical exploration of its multiple meanings». Empiria: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 26, 149-174. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.26.2013.7156

Diestel, Reinhard (2000). Graph Theory. Nueva York.

Dunn, John (1993). «Trust». En: Goodin, Robert E. y Pettit, Philip (eds.). A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631199519.1995.x

Epstein, Joshua M. (2006). Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modelling. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842872

Fukuyama, Francis (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Nueva York: Free Press.

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2011a). «La simulación basada en agentes: Una nueva forma de explorar los fenómenos sociales». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 136, 91-110. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.136.91

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2011b). «Una definición estructural de capital social». Redes: Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.411

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2013). «Grupos moderados y tolerantes en la polarización política de las redes sociales». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 136, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.142.25

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2014a). «El impacto de la estructura de las redes sociales sobre el acceso de los individuos al mercado laboral». Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS), 72(2), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.09.13

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2014b). «Explicación, mecanismo y simulación: Otra forma de hacer sociología». Empiria: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 28, 35-58. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.28.2014.12120

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2015). «La estructura compleja de las redes sociales». Revista Española de Sociología (RES), 24, 65-84.

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2016). Simulación basada en agentes: Una introducción a NetLogo. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 53.

García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio y López, Iván (2017). «Un modelo basado en agentes para el análisis de la segregación étnica espacial urbana». Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 67, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022017000200008

García Vázquez, J.C. y Sancho Caparrini, F. (2016). NetLogo: Una herramienta de Modelado. Payhip.

Gasalla, Jose María y Navarro, Leila (2008). Confianza: La clave para el éxito personal y empresarial. Madrid: Empresa Activa.

Ghavipour, Mina y Meybodi, Mohammad R. (2018). «A dynamic algorithm for stochastic trust propagation in online social networks: Learning automata approach». Computer Communications, 123, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2018.04.004

Gilbert, Nigel (2008). Agent-Based Models: Quantitative applications in the social science 153. Londres: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983259

Gilbert, Nigel y Abbott, Andrew (2005). «Social Science Computation». American Journal of Sociology, 110, 859-863. https://doi.org/10.1086/430413

Gilbert, Nigel y Troitzsch, Klaus G. (2005). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

González-Bailón, Sandra (2004). «¿Sociedades artificiales?: Una introducción a la simulación social». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 39, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2004.i39.268

González-Bailón, Sandra (2006). «The Role of Dynamic Network in Social Capital: A Simulation Experiment». Papers: Revista de Sociología, 80, 171-194. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v80n0.1774

Granovetter, Mark (1973). «The strength of weak ties». American Journal of Sociology, 76, 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Granovetter, Mark (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hanneman, Robert A. y Riddle, Mark (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.

Hardin, Russell (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity.

Hedström, Peter (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488801

Hedström, Peter y Bearman, Peter (eds.) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.001.0001

Herreros, Francisco (2002). ¿Por qué confiar?: El problema de la creación de capital social. Madrid: CEACS.

Herreros, Francisco (2003). «Las fuentes de la confianza social». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 35, 151-175. https://doi.org/10.2307/3541411

Herreros, Francisco (2004). The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust? Nueva York y Londres: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978806

Lewin, Kurt (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. Nueva York, NY: Harper & Row.

Lewin, Kurt (1951). Field Theory in the Social Sciences. Nueva York, NY: Harper.

Lin, Nan (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447

Lucas, Antonio (ed.) (2013). Sociología de las organizaciones. Madrid: Fragua.

Macy, Michael W. y Flache, Andreas (2009). «Social Dynamics from the Bottom Up: Agent-Based Model of Social Interaction». En: Hedström, Peter y Bearman, Peter (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.11

Macy, Michael W. y Miller, Robert (2002). «From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modelling». Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143-66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117

Milgram, Stanley (1967). «The Small World Problem». Psychology Today, 2, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/e400002009-005

Molina, José Luis (2001). El análisis de las redes sociales: Una introducción. Barcelona: Bellaterra.

Montero, José; Zmerli, Sonja y Newton, Ken (2008). «Confianza social, confianza política y satisfacción con la democracia». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 138, 11-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184879

Moreno, Jacob L. (1934). Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nueva York, NY: Beacon Press.

Newman, Mark E.J. (2003). «The Structure and Function of Complex Networks». SIAM Review, 45, 167-256. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480

Newman, Mark E.J.; Barabási, Albert‐László y Watts, Duncan J. (2003). The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_60528

Paramio, Ludolfo (1999). «Estrategias partidarias y desconfianza política». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 22, 183-201.

Pareto, Vilfredo (1906). Manual of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Putnam, Robert D. (1993). «The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life». The American Prospect, 13, 35-42.

Putnam, Robert D. (1995). «Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital». Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Nueva York: Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Ramírez, Jorge y Hernández, Eduardo (2012). «¿Tenía razón Coleman?: Acerca de la relación entre capital social y logro educativo». Sinéctica: Revista Electrónica de Educación, 39, 1-14.

Requena, Félix (1989). «El concepto de red social». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 48, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183465

Rodríguez, Josep A. (1995). Análisis estructural y de redes. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Rousseau, Denise M.; Sitkin, Sim B.; Burt, Ronald S. y Camerer, Colin (1998). «Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust». Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617

Schelling, Thomas C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Nueva York: W.W. Norton.

Siegel, David A. (2009). «Social Networks and Collective Action». American Journal of Political Science, 53, 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00361.x

Snijders, Chris (1996). Trust and Commitments. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

Squazzoni, Flaminio (2012). Agent-Based Computational Sociology. Singapur: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119954200

Steglich, Christian; Snijders, Tom A.B. y Pearson, Michael (2010). «Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence». Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x

Sztompka, Piotr (2006). «New Perspectives on Trust». American Journal of Sociology, 112, 905-919. https://doi.org/10.1086/510993

Wasserman, Stan y Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478

Watts, Duncan J. (1999a). «Network, Dynamic and Small-World Phenomenon». American Journal of Sociology, 105, 493-527. https://doi.org/10.1086/210318

Watts, Duncan J. (1999b). Small Worlds: The Dynamic between Order and Randomness. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36zr5d

Watts, Duncan J. (2003). Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. Nueva York: Norton. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-6452

Watts, Duncan J. (2004). «The new science of networks». Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342

Watts, Duncan J. y Strogatz, Steven H. (1998). «Collective dynamics of “small world” networks». Nature, 393, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

Wilensky, Uri (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Recuperado de http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo .

Wu, Jian y Chiclana, Francisco (2014). «A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations». Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.017

Zipf, George (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Press.

Author Biography

Jose Ignacio García-Valdecasas Medina, Universidad de Valladolid

Profesor ayudante doctor en el Departamento de Sociología y Trabajo Social de la Universidad de Valladolid. Doctor en Sociología por la Universidad de Granada. Fue investigador posdoctoral en la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid y realizó estancias predoctorales en el Nuffield College (Universidad de Oxford) y en el Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de Leicester. Sus intereses investigadores se centran en la sociología analítica, la simulación basada en agentes, el análisis de redes sociales, la teoría de juegos, la sociología de las organizaciones y la sociología política.

Published

26-07-2019

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.