Introduction: The current state of social research methodology in Spain

Authors

Abstract

This article introduces the papers published in the monographic issue dedicated to the current state of methodology in social research in Spain. It gives a brief presentation of each of the papers, which have been chosen to offer the widest possible overview, both in relation to their subject matter and in their methodological orientation and the research experience of the authors. It is notable that the articles presented show a special concern for methodological rigour and innovation, which connects them with the main concerns in current international methodological thought. In addition, the educational aim of all of them is emphasised, in that they offer recommendations of a practical nature, rather than mere abstract discourses and research without purpose.

Keywords

methodological design, data collection, data analysis, quantitative methods, qualitative methods, mixed methods, longitudinal perspective, Spain

References

Baranger, Denis (2018). “Notas sobre la noción de reflexividad en sociología y en la obra de Bourdieu”. In: Piovani, Juan Ignacio and Muñiz, Leticia (eds.), ¿Condenados a la reflexividad? Apuntes para repensar el proceso de investigación social. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

Bazeley, Pat (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Castillo, Juan José; Valles, Miguel S. and Wainerman, Catalina (2009). “Presentación”. Política y Sociedad, 40(3), 7-12.

Creswell, John W. and Plano Clark, Vicki L. (2011). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. 2nd edition.

Creswell, John W. and Plano Clark, Vicki L. (2017). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. 3rd edition.

Daikeler, Jessica; Bosnjak, Michael and Lozar Manfreda, Katja (2020). “Web versus other survey modes: an updated and extended meta-analysis comparing response rates”. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8 (3), 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz008.

Duque, Ignacio and Gómez Benito, Cristóbal (eds.) (2020). En torno a Alfonso Ortí: la sociología crítica como sociohistoria. Madrid: UNED.

Ehler, Ingmar; Wolter, Felix and Junkermann, Justus (2021). “Sensitive Questions in Surveys: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Experimental Survey Studies”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85 (1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab002

Fillmore, Charles (1985). “Frames and the semantics of understanding”. Quaderni di Semántica, 6(2), 222-253.

García de León, Mª Antonia (1993). “Pierre Bourdieu, o la trastienda del conocimiento científico”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 63, 213-215.

García Ferrando, Manuel and Llopis, Ramón. (2015). “La encuesta”. In: Manuel García Ferrando, Francisco Alvira, Luis Enrique Alonso and Modesto Escobar (comps.), El Análisis de la Realidad Social. Madrid: Alianza. 4th edition.

de Heer, Wim, de Leeuw, Edith D. and van der Zouwen, Johannes (1999). “Methodological Issues in Survey Research: a Historic Review”, Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 64 (1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910639906400104

Investigación y Marketing (2021). Monographic issue on Escenarios de futuro y tendencias en la investigación, 151, November.

Lozares, Carlos and Verd, Joan Miquel (2015). “Bases socio-metodológicas del análisis de redes sociales”. In: García Ferrando, Manuel; Alvira, Francisco; Alonso, Luis Enrique and Escobar, Modesto (comps.), El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación. Madrid: Alianza. 4th edition.

Lozares, Carlos; Verd, Joan Miquel; Martí, Joel and López, Pedro (2003). “Relaciones, redes y discurso: revisión y propuestas en torno al análisis reticular de datos textuales”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 101, 175-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184455

Mayntz, R., Holm, K., and Hoebner, B. (1976). Introduction to Empirical Sociology. Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Piovani, Juan Ignacio and Muñiz, Leticia (2018). “Introducción”. In: Piovani, Juan Ignacio and Muñiz, Leticia (eds.), ¿Condenados a la reflexividad? Apuntes para repensar el proceso de investigación social. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

Política y Sociedad (2009). Monographic issue on La trastienda de la Investigación Social, 46(3).

Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (1985). Monographic issue on Metodología sociológica, 29.

Tashakkori, Abbas and Teddlie, Charles (1998). Mixed Methodology. Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Tourangeau, Roger and Yan, Ting (2007). “Sensitive questions in surveys”. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859

Valles, Miguel (2005). “El reto de la calidad en la investigación social cualitativa: de la retórica a los planteamientos de fondo y las propuestas técnicas”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 110, 91-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184684

Varga-Atkins, Tünde and O’Brien, Mark (2009). “From drawings to diagrams: maintaining researcher control during graphic elicitation in qualitative interviews”. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759998

Yan, Ting (2021). “Consequences of asking sensitive questions in surveys”, Annual Review of Statistics and its Application, 8, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040720-033353

Published

2022-10-20

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.