A welfare state for all?

An analysis of social inequalities in applications for and use of public childcare services, and the role of social policy in alleviating them

Authors

Abstract

Early childhood education and (ECEC) is seen as a key social investment policy for helping to mitigate social inequalities. The Matthew effect (ME from now on) is the process that explains how suffering social disadvantages leads to more disadvantages. Following the logic of the ME, it will be the most disadvantaged families that have proportionally less access to these services. This study investigates the mechanisms that produce these inequalities and to what extent they can be reduced by ECEC access criteria that promote equal opportunities. An analysis is carried out of a survey addressed to 1,219 mothers in Catalonia with children under 3 years of age about the use of different types of informal and formal care services. The results show that nursery services, through progressive access criteria, can significantly reduce inequalities that are due to the mother’s income. Likewise, sliding-scale pricing and social services are effective public policies for reducing the ME. However, despite these measures, the mother’s level of education and place of birth are factors that continue to lead to an unequal proportion of places being taken up, which is not explained by preferences expressed by the mother. Two possible causes are suggested: first, in a context of scarcity of supply, mothers with university studies have more resources for obtaining nursery places in the allocation system; second, mothers without studies or born outside of Spain often lack job stability and have to cope with atypical schedules.

Keywords

childcare, nurseries, early childhood, social investment, inequalities, Matthew effect, regulation, social policy, welfare state, formal care, local government

References

Abrassart, Aurélien y Bonoli, Giuliano (2015). «Availability, Cost or Culture?: Obstacles to Childcare Services for Low-Income Families». Journal of Social Policy, 44 (4), 787-806. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000288

Bonoli, Giuliano (2013). The origins of active social policy: Labour market and childcare policies in a comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669769.001.0001

Bonoli, Giuliano y Vuille, Sandrine (2013). L’accueil de jour des enfants dans le Canton de Vaud. Lausana: Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration.

Calsamiglia, Caterina y Güell, Maia (2018). «Priorities in school choice: The case of the Boston mechanism in Barcelona». Journal of Public Economics, 163, 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.04.011

Coneus, Katja; Goeggel, Kathrin y Muehler, Grit (2007). «Determinants of Child Care Participation». ZEW Discussion Paper, 07-074. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1080532

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Polity.

Felfe, Christina y Lalive, Rafael (2013). «Early child care and child development: For whom it works and why». SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, 535.

Ghysels, Joris y Lancker, Wim van (2011). «The unequal benefits of activation: an analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children». Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 472-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711418853

Hausman, Jerry A. (1978). «Specification tests in econometrics». Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1-251-1-271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

IERMB (2021). Avaluació de la tarificació social a les escoles bressol municipals de Barcelona: un anàlisi en clau d’equitat social. Disponible en https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/premsa/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Avaluacio-de-la-tarifacio%CC%81-social-EBM-Barcelona-1.pdf

IVÀLUA (2020). Procés d’admissió de l’alumnat a la ciutat de Barcelona. Avaluació del disseny i implementación. Disponible en https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-05/Informe_Assignacio_Escolar_Marc2021.pdf

Lancker, Wim van (2018). «Reducing inequality in childcare service use across European countries: What (if any) is the role of social spending?». Social Policy & Administration, 52 (1), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12311

Lancker, Wim van y Ghysels, Joris (2012). «Who benefits? The social distribution of subsidized childcare in Sweden and Flanders». Acta Sociologica, 55 (2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699311433428

León, Margarita (2017). «Social Investment and Childcare Expansion: A Perfect Match». En: Hemerijk, Anton (ed.). The uses of social investment. Oxford Scholarship Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790488.003.0010

León, Margarita; Ranci, Costanzo; Sabatinelli, Stefania e Ibáñez, Zyab (2019). «Tensions between quantity and quality in social investment agendas: Working conditions of ECEC teaching staff in Italy and Spain». Journal of European Social Policy, 29 (4), 564-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718808401

León, Margarita et al. (2019). Estudio de datos y análisis de políticas para la extensión equitativa de la educación infantil (0-3) en España. Institut de Govern Polítiques Públiques. Disponible en https://igop.uab.cat/es/2019/10/24/informe-para-save-the-children-donde-todo-empieza/

Levi‐Faur, David (2014). «The welfare state: A regulatory perspective». Public Administration, 92 (3), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12063

Magnuson, Katherine A.; Ruhm, Cristopher J. y Waldfogel, Jane (2007). «Does prekindergarten improve school preparation and performance?». Economics of Education Review, 26 (1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10452

Navarro-Varas, Lara (2019). El cuidado de la primera infancia. Desigualdades sociales y territoriales en la metrópolis de Barcelona. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Disponible en https://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/669604

Nollenberger, Natalia y Rodríguez-Planas, Núria (2015). «Full-time universal childcare in a context of low maternal employment: Quasi-experimental evidence from Spain». Labour Economics, 36, 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.008

OECD (2011). Doing Better for Families. París: OECD.

Pavolini, Emmanuele y Lancker, Wim van (2018). «The Matthew effect in childcare use: a matter of policies or preferences?». Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (6), 878-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1401108

Rigney, Daniel (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Síndic de Greuges de Catalunya (2015). Informe sobre la igualtat d’oportunitats en l’educació infantil (0 -3 anys). Disponible en http://www.sindic.cat/site/unitFiles/3904/Informe%20escolaritzacio%200_3%20anys_OK.pdf

Vandenbroeck, Michel; Visscher, Sven de; Nuffel, Karen van y Ferla, Johan (2008). «Mothers’ search for infant child care: The dynamic relationship between availability and desirability in a continental European welfare state». Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.09.002

Published

2022-07-12

How to Cite

Palomera, D. (2022). A welfare state for all? An analysis of social inequalities in applications for and use of public childcare services, and the role of social policy in alleviating them. Papers. Revista De Sociologia, 107(3), e3068. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.3068

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.