Integración de la perspectiva de género en tiempos de crisis: oportunidades perdidas en la formulación de políticas para pandemias
Resumen
El artículo problematiza la integración de la perspectiva de género en las respuestas políticas suecas al Covid-19 en relación con la política económica. El objetivo es comprender cómo se implementó la integración de la perspectiva de género y cuáles fueron sus efectos. Aún se sabe poco sobre la integración de la perspectiva de género en la gestión de crisis y la formulación de políticas, y se sabe aún menos en relación con las respuestas políticas a la pandemia. Con el fin de contribuir a este campo de conocimiento, el artículo analiza el Plan Nacional de Recuperación y Resiliencia de Suecia, complementado con entrevistas a funcionarios públicos, para comprender los factores que inciden en la integración de la perspectiva de género en la formulación de políticas en tiempos de crisis social. Teóricamente, el artículo se basa en el institucionalismo feminista y los estudios de implementación, la noción de resiliencia y los conocimientos del análisis crítico del marco. Los datos se basan en un conjunto de datos más amplio recopilado en RESISTIRÉ: Responding to Outbreaks through Co-creative Inclusive Equality Strategies, proyecto financiado por la UE. Los resultados indican que la integración de la perspectiva de género está limitada en su racionalidad y alcance en tiempos de crisis y que en la gestión de crisis debe desarrollarse de varias maneras importantes.
Palabras clave
crisis, economía, igualdad de género, integración de la perspectiva de género, Plan Nacional de Recuperación y Resiliencia, formulación de políticas para pandemias, RESISTIRÉ, SueciaCitas
Acker, J. (1992). “Gendered Institutions. From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528
Ahrens, P. and Callerstig, A-C. (2017). “The European Social Fund and the Institutionalization of Gender Mainstreaming in Sweden and Germany.” In: MacRae, H. and Weiner, E. (eds.). Towards Gendering Institutionalism: Equality in Europe. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield International Limited.
Ahrne, G. and Svensson, P. (2011). Handbok i kvalitativa metoder. Malmö: Liber.
Andersson, R. (2011). Om översättning av policy och nätverksstyrning med förhinder inom den regionala utvecklingspolitiken, 1998–2007. Linköping: Linköping University Press.
Axelsson, T. K., Callerstig, A-C., Sandström, L. and Strid, S. (2021). RESISTIRÉ D4.1 Qualitative Indications of Inequalities Produced by COVID-19 and its Policy Responses. 1st Cycle Summary Report. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5595815
Bakker, I. (1994) The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed Books.
Bandola-Gill, J. (2021). “The legitimacy of experts in policy: navigating technocratic and political accountability in the case of global poverty governance.” Evidence & Policy, 17 (4), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X16000980489195
Bogdanor, V. (ed.) (2005). Joined-up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263334.001.0001
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bustelo, M. and Mazur, A. G. (2023). “The Practice of Ideas in Gender Equality Policy: Comparative Lessons from the Field.” European Journal of Gender and Politics, 6 (1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16696345290590
Callerstig, A-C. (2014). Making Equality Work: Ambiguities, Conflicts and Change Agents in the Implementation of Equality Policies in Public Sector Organisations. Linköping: Linköping University Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-105207
Callerstig, A-C. (2012). “Gender Equality and Public Services.” In: Lindholm, K. (ed.). (2012). Gender Mainstreaming in Public Sector Organisations. Policy Implications and Practical Applications. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Callerstig, A-C and Lindholm, K. (2011). “Det motsägelsefulla arbetet med jämställdhetsintegrering.” Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, (2–3), 81–96.
Candel, J. J. L., and Biesbroek, G. R. (2016). “Toward a Processual Understanding of Policy Integration.” Policy Sciences, 49 (3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
Candel, J. J. L. (2017). “Holy Grail or Inflated Expectations? The Success and Failure of Integrated Policy Strategies.” Policy Studies, 38 (6), 519–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1337090
Cejudo, G. M. and Michel, C.L. (2017). “Addressing Fragmented Government Action: Coordination, Coherence, and Integration.” Policy Sciences 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
Chappell, L. (2006). “Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness’.” Politics and Gender 2 (2), 223–225.
Cibin, R., Stöckelová, T. and Linková, M. (2021). RESISTIRE D2.1 - Summary Report Mapping Cycle 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5361042
Cibin, R., Ghidoni, E., Aristegui Fradua, E., Beloki Marañon, U. Stöckelová, T. and Linková, M. (2022). RESISTIRÉ D2.2 - Summary Report Mapping Cycle 2. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6536060
Connell, R. (2006). “Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksites.” Public Administration Review, 66 (6), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.x
Bares Lopez, L., Costanza, F., Ortega Gil, M., and Strid, S. (2023). “Integrating Gender Equality in Economics and Management. In: Vujadinovic, D., Fröhlich, M. and Giegerich, T. (eds.). Gender-Competent Legal Education. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14360-1
Council of Europe (1998). Gender Mainstreaming: Conceptual Framework, Methodology and Presentation of Good Practices. Council of Europe. EG-S-MS (98) 2 rev.
Dy, A. and Vershinina, N. (2019). “‘We Were Fighting for our Place’: Resisting Gender Knowledge Regimes through Feminist Knowledge Network Formation.” Gender, Work and Organization, 26 (6), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12288
Government Offices of Sweden (2021). Economic Gender Equality. https://www.government.se/contentassets/20cfe7b78745414fa1e58cadbb3f91e6/economic-gender-equality-2021.pdf
Elomäki, A. and Kantola, J. (2022). “Feminist Governance in the European Parliament: The Political Struggle Over the Inclusion of Gender in the EU’s COVID-19 Response.” Politics & Gender, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000544
Elomäki, A. (2015). “The Economic Case for Gender Equality in the European Union: Selling Gender Equality to Decision-Makers and Neoliberalism to Women’s Organizations.” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 22 (3), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050681557114
Elson, D. (1994). “Micro, Meso, Macro: Gender and Economic Analysis in the Context of Policy Reform.” In: Bakker, I. (ed.). The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. Ottawa: Zed Books.
Elson, D. (1991). “Male Bias in Macro-Economics: The Case of Structural Adjustment.” In: Elson, D. (ed.). Male Bias in the Development Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Engeli, I. and Mazur, A. (2018). “Taking Implementation Seriously in Assessing Success: The Politics of Gender Equality Policy.” European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1-2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15282097548558
European Commission (2021). Guidance to Member States, Recovery and Resilience Plans. Commission staff working document, SWD (2021) 12 final, Brussels, 22 January 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/document_travail_service_part1_v2_en.pdf [Accessed 2022-10-15].
European Commission (2022). Recovery Plan for Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/recovery-plan-europe_en [Accessed 2022-10-16].
European Commission (no date). Recovery and Resilience Plan for Sweden. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility/recovery-and-resilience-plan-sweden_en [Accessed 2022-10-16].
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (2020). Gender Equality Index 2020; Key Findings for the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2839/341140
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R0241
Forbes, B. C., Stammler, F., Kumpula, T., Meschtyb, N., Pajunen, A. & Kaarlejärvi, E. (2009). High resilience in the Yamal-Nenets social–ecological system, West Siberian Arctic, Russia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (52), 22041–22048. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908286106
Freidenvall, L. (2020). “Gender Knowledge and Gender Expertise: The Implementation of Gender Mainstreaming in Swedish State Agencies.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27 (4), 742–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa034
Gains, F. and Lowndes, V. (2014). “How Is Institutional Formation Gendered, and Does It Make a Difference? A New Conceptual Framework and a Case Study of Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales.” Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 524–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000403
Gender Equality Agency (2021a). Håll i, håll ut och växla upp. Resultat av jämställdhetspolitiska åtgärder 2020. Redovisning av uppdrag enligt förordning med instruktion §8. Rapport 2021:14. Stockholm: The Gender Equality Agency. https://jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se/media/zdebrhzs/2021-14-jamstalldhetspolitiska-atgarder-2020.pdf
Gender Equality Agency (2021b). How Has Covid-19 Affected Economic Gender Equality? [Hur har covid-19 påverkat den economiska jämställdheten?]. Report 2021: 24. Stockholm: The Gender Equality Agency. https://jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se/aktuellt/publikationer/hur-har-covid-19-pandemin-paverkat-den-ekonomiska-jamstalldheten/
Gender Equality Agency (2021c). Covid-19 and Exposure to Violence. [Covid-10 och våldsutsatthet]. Report 2021:8. Stockholm: The Gender Equality Agency. https://jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se/aktuellt/publikationer/covid-19-och-valdsutsatthet-2021-8/ [Accessed 2022-10-16].
Gender Equality Agency (2022). Ekonomisk jämställdhet – en uppföljning av senare års utveckling av det jämställdhetspolitiska delmålet. Rapport 2022:2 https://jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se/aktuellt/publikationer/ekonomisk-jamstalldhet-en-uppfoljning-av-senare-ars-utveckling-av-det-jamstalldhetspolitiska-delmalet-2022-2/
Jacquot, S. (2010). “The Paradox of Gender Mainstreaming: Unanticipated Effects of New Modes of Governance in the Gender Equality Domain.” West European Politics, 33 (1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354163
Jahan, R. (1995). The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development. London: Zed Books.
Kaplan, S. (2020). “How to ‘Build Back Better’ after COVID-19.” Rothman Management Magazine, Fall issue 2020, University of Toronto. https://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/Connect/Rotman-MAG/IdeaExchange/Page1/Fall2020-Kaplan [Accessed 2022-10-15].
Kenny, M. (2007). “Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review.” Politics 27, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00284.x
Kenny M. (2013). “A Feminist Institutionalist Approach.” In Gender and Political Recruitment. Gender and Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271945_3
Kenny, M. (2014). “A Feminist Institutionalist Approach.” Politics & Gender 10 (4), 679–684. https://doi:10.1017/S1743923X14000488
Klatzer, E. and Rinaldi, A. (2020). “#NextGenerationEU” Leaves Women Behind. (Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament).
Krook, M. and Mackay, F. (2011). Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Springer.
Levitt, P. and Merry, S. (2009). “Vernacularization on the Ground: Local uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States”. Global Networks, 9 (4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00263.x
Linde, A. and Regnér, Å. (2020). “Kvinnor drabbas extra hårt av coronakrisen.” Aftonbladet 13 April 2020. https://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/a/g7nBWk/kvinnor-drabbas-extra-hart-av-coronakrisen [Accessed 2023-05-07].
Lowndes, V. (2020). “How are Political Institutions Gendered?” Political Studies, 68 (3), 543–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719867667
Mackay, F., & Waylen, G. (2014). “Introduction: Gendering ‘New’ Institutions.” Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000385
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984). “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”. The American Political Science Review, 78 (2), 734–749.
Nelson, J. A. (1995). “Feminism and Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (2): 131–148.
O’Dwyer, M. (2022). “Gender and Crises in European Economic Governance: Is this Time Different?” Journal of Common Market Studies, 60 (1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13273
Ostrom, E. (1999). “Coping with tragedies of the commons”, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493– 535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
Pearse, R. and Connell, R. (2016). “Gender Norms and the Economy: Insights from Social Research.” Feminist Economics, 22 (1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1078485
Paterson, S. and Scala, F. (2017). “Gender Mainstreaming and the Discursive Politics of Public Service Values.” Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2016.1273726
Public & Science (2021/2022). Communication About Corona. Media Reporting and Trust During the Covid-19 Pandemic. https://v-a.se/english-portal/projects/studies/the-public/corona/ [Accessed 2022-10-16].
Rao, A. and Kelleher, D. (2005). “Is There Life After Gender Mainstreaming?” Gender and Development, 13 (2), 57–69. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20053149
Rayner, J. and Howlett, M. (2009a). “Conclusion: Governance Arrangements and Policy Capacity for Policy Integration.” Policy and Society 28 (2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.005
Rayner, J. and Howlett, M. (2009b). “Introduction: Understanding Integrated Policy Strategies and Their Evolution.” Policy and Society, 28 (2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.001
Regulation (EU) 2021/241 Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility. 12 February 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en
Riley, H. and McGinn, K. L. (2002). “When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation?” John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP02-036 September 2002.
Rubery, J. and Tavora, I. (2021). “The Covid-19 Crisis and Gender Equality: Risks and Opportunities”. In: Vanhercke, B., Spasova, S. and Fronteddu, B. (eds.). Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2020: Facing the Pandemic. Brussels: ETUI.
Sandström, L., Axelsson, T. K., Callerstig, A-C., Strid, S. and Bobek, A. (2022). RESISTIRÉ D4.2: Building back better? Qualitative Indications of Inequalities Produced by Covid-19 and its Policy and Societal Responses. Second Cycle Summary Report. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517795.
Sainsbury, D. and Bergqvist C. (2009). “The Promise and Pitfalls of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11 (2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740902789575
Sapala, M. (2021). Gender Equality in the Recovery and Resilience Facility. EPRS: European Parliamentary Research Service. Belgium. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1860837/gender-equality-in-the-recovery-and-resilience-facility/2609286/ [Accessed 2022-10-16].
Sapala, M. and Thomassen, N. (2021). Recovery Plan for Europe: State of Play, ERS September 202. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/696209/EPRS_BRI(2021)696209_EN.pdf [Accessed 2022-10-15].
Schofield, J. (2004). “A Model of Learned Implementation.” Public Administration 82 (2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00395.x
Scott, W.R. (2008). Institutions and Organisations, Ideas and Interests. London: SAGE publications.
Sjöö, K. and Callerstig, A.-C. (2021). “The Challenges in Integrating Horizontal Perspectives in Sectoral Policy Evaluation.” Policy Studies, 44 (2), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.2015312
Stovell, C., Rossetti, F., Lionello, L., Still, A., Charafeddine, R., Humbert, A. L. and Tzanakou,
C. (2021). RESISTIRÉ D3.1: Summary Report on Mapping of Quantitative Indicators -
Cycle 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5541035
Stratigaki, M. (2005). “Gender Mainstreaming vs Positive Action: An Ongoing Conflict in EU Gender Equality Policy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12 (2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805051236
Sweden Statistics (SCB) (2020). Economic Gender Equality. (https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/temaomraden/jamstalldhet/ekonomisk-jamstalldhet/) [Accessed 2022-10-15].
Swedish Government (2021). Sweden’s Recovery Plan. https://www.regeringen.se/rapporter/2021/05/sveriges-aterhamtningsplan/ [Accessed 2022-10-15].
Swedish Government (2018). Economic Gender Equality. https://www.government.se/articles/2018/01/sub-target-2-economic-gender-equality [accessed 2022-10-15].
Swedish Government (2016). Gender Equality Goals. https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/jamstalldhet/mal-for-jamstalldhet [accessed 2022-10-15].
Verloo, M. (2005). “Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. A Critical Frame Analysis approach.” The Greek Review of Social Research, 117, 11–34. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.9555
Verloo, M. (2007). Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Publicado
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2023 Anne-Charlott Callerstig, Sofia Strid
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
