The architecture of rent: Hybrid property regimes in São Paulo’s favelas
Abstract
This paper examines how rental markets have become a defining mode of incremental housing production in São Paulo’s informal settlements, transforming self-built dwellings from vehicles of social inclusion into financial assets. Based on ethnographic research and architectural documentation of 236 properties in two large favelas, it develops a typology that links built form to ownership, finance, management and social relations. The analysis shows that the shift from use-oriented to exchange-oriented housing is not an abstract economic transition but one that materializes in vertical additions, property subdivision, and new forms of landlord–tenant cohabitation. Cycles of rental densification commodify land once designated for social use and heighten housing precarity, yet they also generate new livelihood opportunities, diverse housing forms, and collective investment arrangements that mediate the dominance of market logics. These hybrid property regimes challenge prevailing models of urban integration that link settlement consolidation with ownership.
Keywords
Built Environments, Informal urbanization, Incremental housing, Rental markets, Hybrid property regimesReferences
Azhar, A.; Buttrey, H. & Ward, P. M. (2021). “‘Slumification’ of consolidated informal settlements: A largely unseen challenge”. Current Urban Studies, 9(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2021.93020
Blanco, A.; Ciblis, V. & Muñoz, A. (2014). Rental housing wanted: Policy options forLatin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0012834
Bonduki, N. G. (1994). Origens da habitação social no Brasil: Arquitetura moderna, lei do inquilinato e difusão da casa própria [Origins of social housing in Brazil: Modern architecture, rent control, and the diffusion of homeownership]. São Paulo, Brazil: Estação Liberdade. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41011028
Caldeira, T. (2016). “Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global South”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758166584
Cavalcanti, M. (2008). “Do barraco à casa: Tempo, espaço e valor(es) em uma favela consolidada”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 29(84), 63–76. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbcsoc/a/zdwmQ4hj8MTLkhYSJMS4QdS/?format=pdf&lang=pt
Data Favela (2019). Pesquisa nacional sobre o perfil socioeconômico das favelas brasileiras. Instituto Locomotiva & CUFA.
Durand-Lasserve, A. & Selod, H. (2009). “The formalization of urban land tenure in developing countries”. In: S. V. Lall, M. Freire, B. Yuen, R. Rajack & J. J. Helluin (Eds.), Urban land markets (pp. 231–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8862-9_5
Duhau, E. (2008). Hábitat popular y política urbana. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Fernandes, E. (2000). “The legalization of favelas in Brazil: Problems and prospects”. Third World Planning Review, 22(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.22.2.l43t0188g17q5885
Fernandes, E. (2007). “Constructing the “right to the city” in Brazil”. Social & Legal Studies, 16(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907076529
Fernandes, E. (2010). Law and urban change in Brazil. Ashgate.
Fix, M. & Arantes, P. F. (2022). “On urban studies in Brazil: The favela, uneven urbanisation and beyond”. Urban Studies, 59(5), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211056607
Friendly, A. (2013). “The right to the city: Theory and practice in Brazil”. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.783098
Gilbert, A. (1999). “A home is forever? Residential mobility and homeownership in self-help settlements”. Environment and Planning A, 31(6), 1073–1091. https://doi.org/10.1068/a311073
Gilbert, A. (2014). “Rental housing: The international experience”. Habitat International, 41, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002
Gilbert, A. & Varley, A. (1991). Landlord and tenant: Housing the poor in urban Mexico. London: Routledge.
Greene, M. & Soler, F. (2004). “The urban spatial structure of Latin American cities”. In: D. McGranahan & G. Martine (Eds.), The urban population of the world: Urbanization, internal migration, and urban spatial structure (pp. 99–121). Earthscan.
Guerreiro, I. A. (2020). “Rent as management of housing insecurity: Possibilities of the securitization of the right to housing”. Cadernos Metrópole, 22(49), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2020-4904
Guerreiro, I. A. (2024). “Produção imobiliária em periferias de São Paulo: Ilegalismos sob lógica rentista”. Cadernos Metrópole, 26(61), 1–28. PUC-SP. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2024-6164768-pt
Guerreiro, I. A.; Rolnik, R. & Marín-Toró, A. (2022). “Gestão neoliberal da precariedade: O aluguel residencial como nova fronteira de financeirização da moradia”. Cadernos Metrópole, 24(54), 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2022-5401
Holston, J. (1991). “Autoconstruction in working-class Brazil”. Cultural Anthropology, 6(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1991.6.4.02a00020
IBGE (2010). Censo demográfico 2010: Aglomerados subnormais. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.
Klink, J. J. & Denaldi, R. (2025). “The properties of rent, real estate and urban reform in the contested appropriation of space in contemporary Brazilian favelas”. Progress in Planning, 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2025.100987
Kowarick, L. & Ant, C. (1988). “Cem anos de promiscuidade: O cortiço na cidade de São Paulo”. In: L. Kowarick (Ed.), As lutas sociais e a cidade: São Paulo passado e presente (pp. 117–146). Paz e Terra.
Lombard, M.; Hernández-García, J. & López Angulo, A. (2021). “Informal rental housing in Colombia: An essential option for low-income households”. International Development Planning Review, 43(2), 257–277. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/idpr.2020.6
Maricato, E. (1982). “Autoconstrução: A arquitetura do possível”. In: E. Maricato (Ed.), A produção capitalista da casa (e da cidade) no Brasil industrial. Alfa-Ômega. https://erminiamaricato.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/a-produccca7acc83o-capitalista-da-casa-e-da-cidade-no-brasil-industrial.pdf
Maricato, E. (2001). O impasse da política urbana no Brasil. Vozes. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3964589
National Science Foundation (2015-2017). Constructing Empirical Public Decision-Making: The Application of Situated Data to Development in Consolidated Informal Settlements. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1513395&HistoricalAwards=false
Oliveira, F. (2006). “O vício da virtude: Autoconstrução e acumulação capitalista no Brasil”. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 74, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002006000100005
Omena, E. (2024). “A financeirização urbana brasileira em perspectiva comparada: Um complexo realmente imobiliário-financeiro?”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, 26(1), e202410. https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202438
Perlman, J. (2010). Favela: Four decades of living on the edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.182
Rolnik, R. (2011). “Democracy on the edge: Limits and possibilities in the implementation of an urban reform agenda in Brazil”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 239–255.
Rolnik, R. (2019). Urban warfare: Housing under the empire of finance. Verso. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01036.x
Roy, A. (2005). “Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning”. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689
Roy, A. (2009). “Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence, and the idiom of urbanization”. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299
Sampaio, M. R. A. (1991). Heliópolis: O percurso de uma invasão (Unpublished master’s thesis). Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, University of São Paulo.
Sampaio, M. R. A. (1994). “O papel da iniciativa privada na formação da periferia paulistana”. Espaços & Debates, 37, 19–33. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/000880379
Siembieda, W. & Del Rio, V. (2009). Contemporary urbanism in Brazil: Beyond Brasília. University Press of Florida.
Stiphany, K. (2019). “Mutirão: The architecture of agency”. Journal of Architectural Education, 73(2), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2019.1633207
Stiphany, K. & Ward, P. (2019). “Autogestão in an era of mass housing: Brazil’s Minha Casa Minha Vida Entidades(MCMV-E) program”. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1540739
Stiphany, K., Ward, P. & Perez, L. (2022). “Informal Settlement Upgrading and the Rise of Rental Housing in São Paulo, Brazil”. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 44(3), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211065495
Stiphany, K. & Wegmann, J. (2020). “From Self-Builder to Senhorio: Rentrification in São Paulo’s Favelas”. Conference Proceedings. American Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference. Greenville, SC.
Varley, A. (2001). Private or public: Debating the meaning of tenure legalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(3), 449–461.
Ward, P. M. (Ed.) (1982). Self-help housing: A critique. Mansell.
Ward, P. M. (2012). “Self-help housing ideas and practice in the Americas”. In: B. Sanyal, L. Vale & C. Rosan (Eds.), Planning ideas that matter (pp. 283–310). MIT Press.
Ward, P. M., Huerta, E. J. & Di Virgilio, M. (2014). Housing policy in Latin American cities: A new generation of strategies and approaches. Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Funding data
-
National Science Foundation
Grant numbers #1513395
Copyright (c) 2025 Kristine Stiphany
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
