UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-Custodial Sanctions for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules): A Gendered Critique
Abstract
In 2010, the United Nations adopted the United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-Custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the “Bangkok Rules”). This was a landmark step in adapting the 1955 Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners to women offenders and prisoners, and was an important precursor for the revision of the 1955 rules themselves. As ‘soft law’, they are human rights principles that recognize that female prisoners have different needs from male prisoners. They take into account, among others, the presence of high levels of victimization among women prisoners and their greater propensity for self-harm and suicide; the special status of some women prisoners as mothers of children; the particular health and hygiene concerns of women; the stigma and discrimination facing women prisoners; the need for gender-responsive programs and activities for women in prison; and the particular needs of indigenous women prisoners and those from diverse religious and cultural backgrounds. They call for gender-responsive and gender-sensitive policies and programs in prison in a wide variety of areas: intake, classification, mental and physical healthcare, mothering in prison, searches, and the development of pre- and post-release programs that take into account the stigmatization and discrimination that women face upon release from prison, among others. We will explore the history and background of these rules, offer a critique, and discuss their implications for feminist criminological interventions related to women in prison around the world.Keywords
women offenders, feminist criminology, Bangkok Rules, prisons, women prisonersReferences
Alexander, Michelle (2012). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
Almeda, Elisabet (2005). “Women’s imprisonment in Spain.” Punishment & Society, 7, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474505050442
Barberet, Rosemary (2014). Women, Crime and Criminal Justice: A Global Enquiry. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, Elizabeth (2010). “Militarized Humanitarianism Meets Carceral Feminism: The Politics of Sex, Rights, and Freedom in Contemporary Antitrafficking Campaigns.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36 (1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/652918
— (2012). “Carceral politics as gender justice? The ‘traffic in women’ and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights.” Theory and Society, 41 (3), 233–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11186-012-9165-9
Bernstein, Elizabeth and Jakobsen, Janet R. (2010). “Sex, Secularism and Religious Influence in US Politics.” Third World Quarterly, 31 (6), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502739
Carlen, Pat and Worrall, Anne (2004). Analysing women’s imprisonment. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
Chen, Michelle (2015). “How Prison Reform Could Turn the Prison-Industrial Complex into the Treatment-Industrial Complex.” The Nation. http://www.thenation.com/article/how-prison-reform-could-turn-the-prisonindustrial-complex-into-the-treatment-industrial-complex
Conrad, Ryan (2014). Against Equality: Queer Revolution, Not Mere Inclusion. Edinburgh and Oakland and Baltimore: AK Press.
Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (2010). “Sacrosanct or flawed: Risk, accountability and gender-responsive penal politics.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22 (2), 193–215. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=649117801335934;res=IELHSS
— (2012). “I Had To Run Away” The imprisonment of women and girls for “Moral Crimes” in Afghanistan. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/afghanistan0312webwcover_0.pdf
International Centre for Prison Studies (2004). Guidance note 13: Reforming women’s prisons. London: International Centre for Prison Studies, King’s College London.
McCorkel, Jill (2013). Breaking Women: Gender, Race, and the New Politics of Imprisonment. New York and London: New York University Press.
Mogul, Joey L., Ritchie, Andrea J., and Whitlock, Kay (2012). Queer (In)Justice: The Criminalization of LGBT People in the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Robertson, Oliver (2011). Collateral convicts: Children of incarcerated parents: Recommendations and good practice from the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. Day of General Discussion 2011. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office. www.quno.org/geneva/pdf/humanrights/women-in-prison/201203Analytical-DGDReport-internet.pdf
Spade, Dean (2011). Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics and the Limits of Law. New York: South End Press.
Sudbury, Julia (2004). “Women of color, globalization, and the politics of incarceration.” In: Price, Barbara and Sokoloff, Natalie (eds.) The criminal justice system and women, 220–234. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sudbury, Julia (ed.) (2005). Global lockdown: Race, gender and the prison-industrial complex. New York: Routledge.
United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A/RES/3/217A.
— (1955). Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.
— (1965). Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 660, p. 195.
— (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171.
— (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3.
— (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13.
— (1984). the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1465, p. 85.
— (1988). Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment. A/RES/43/173.
— (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, p. 3.
— (1990). Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners. A/RES/45/111.
— (2010). United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women prisoners and Noncustodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules). A/C.3/65/L.5.
United Nations Office for Project Services (2016). Technical guidance for prison planning. Technical and operational considerations based on the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). Copenhagen: Author. https://www.unops.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publications/TechnicalGuidance_PrisonPlanning.pdf
— (2008). Handbook for prison managers and policymakers on women and imprisonment. Vienna: Author. www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/women-and-imprisonment.pdf
— (2010). Gender in the criminal justice system assessment tool. Criminal Justice Assessment Toolkit. Vienna: Author. www.unodc.org/documents/justice-andprison-reform/crimeprevention/E-book.pdf
Walmsley, Roy (2015). World female imprisonment list (3rd edition). London: International Centre for Prison Studies, Kings College London.
Ward, Eilís and Wylie, Gillian (eds.) (Forthcoming). Prostitution, Feminism, and the State: The Politics of Neo-abolitionism. New York and London: Routledge Press.
Wright, Emily, M., Van Voorhis, Patricia, Salisbury, Emily J., and Bauman, Ashley (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 39, 1612–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451088
Yagüe Olmos, Concepción. (2007). Madres en prisión. Granada, Spain: Editorial Comares.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2017 Rosemary Barberet, Crystal Jackson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
