Social inequality in the conclusion of secondary education and the progression to tertiary education: A multinational analysis with cases from Southern Europe and Latin America
Abstract
This article analyzes inequality in educational opportunity (IEO) in the probability of finishing secondary education and accessing tertiary education across birth cohorts of 22 countries, including two Southern European (Spain and Portugal) and three Latin American countries (Argentina, Chile and Mexico). Two of the most influential hypotheses of comparative multinational research are evaluated: Mare’s selectivity hypothesis and Raftery and Hout’s Maximally Maintained Inequality hypothesis. The results show that both hypotheses are not supported by empirical trends, particularly when measures of IEO are based on relative risks rather than odds ratios. Southern European and Latin American countries show the highest inequality levels, particularly in the conclusion of secondary education, and early industrialized countries experience a displacement of inequality from secondary to tertiary education. In addition, IEO is greatly reduced in the early stages of the educational expansion process. This suggests that it is necessary to revise some of the most influential hypotheses on educational stratification research in light of the experiences of countries with late and more heterogeneous experiences of industrialization.Keywords
educational inequality, educational transitions, late industrialization, social stratificationReferences
Arum, R.; Gamoran, A. y Shavit, Y. (2007). «More inclusion than diversion: Expansion, differentiation, and market structure in higher education». Stratification in higher education: A comparative study, 1-35.
Blanco, E.; Solís, P. y Robles, H. (2014). Caminos desiguales, trayectorias educativas y laborales de los jóvenes en la Ciudad de México. México, DF: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.
Blau, Peter M. y Duncan O. D. (1967). The American ocupational structure. Nueva York: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092400
Breen, R.; Luijkx, R.; Müller, W. y Pollak, R. (2009a). «Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries». American Journal of Sociology, 114 (5), 1475-1521. https://doi.org/10.1086/595951
Breen, R.; Luijkx, R.; Müller, W. y Pollak, R. (2009b). «Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: Class inequalities and gender differences». European Sociological Review, 26 (1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp001
Cameron, S. V. y Heckman, J. J. (1998). «Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: Models and evidence for five cohorts of American males». Journal of Political Economy, 106 (2), 262-333. https://doi.org/10.1086/250010
Cárdenas Denham, S. (2011). «Escuelas de doble turno en México: una estimación de diferencias asociadas con su implementación». Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 16 (50), 801-827.
De Graa f, P. M. (1986). «The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands». Sociology of Education, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112350
García, J. S. M. (2017). Estructura social y desigualdad en España. Los Libros de la Catarata.
Hansen, M. N. (1997). «Social and economic inequality in the educational career: Do the effects of social background characteristics decline?». European Sociological Review, 13 (3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018220
Jorrat, J. R. (2011). «Diferencias de acceso a la educación en Argentina: 2003-2007». Lavboratorio (24).
Kolenikov, S. y Ángeles, G. (2004). The use of discrete data in principal component analysis with applications to socio-economic indices. CPC. MEASURE Working Paper N. WP-04-85.
Lucas , S. R. (2001). «Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects». American Journal of Sociology, 106 (6), 1642-1690. https://doi.org/10.1086/321300
Maceira, V. V. (2015). «Un abordaje teórico-metodológico para la investigación de la estructura, la movilidad social y las condiciones de vida: la propuesta ENES-PISAC». Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, 5 (2).
Mare, R. D. (1979). «Social background composition and educational growth». Demography, 16 (1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061079
Mare, R. D. (1980). «Social background and school continuation decisions». Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75 (370), 295-305.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2287448
Mare, R. D. (1981). «Change and stability in educational stratification». American Sociological Review, 72-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095027
Munk, M. D. y Thomsen, J. P. (2018). «Horizontal stratification in access to Danish university programmes». Acta Sociologica, 61 (1), 50-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317694941
Pfeffer, F. T. (2008). «Persistent inequality in educational attainment and its institutional context». European Sociological Review, 24 (5), 543-565. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn026
Raftery, A. E. y Hout, M. (1993). «Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75». Sociology of Education, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112784
Reimer, D. y Pollak, R. (2009). «Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany». European Sociological Review, 26 (4), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp029
Rios-Neto, E. L. G. y De Meireles Guimarães, R. R. (2010). «The demography of education in Brazil: inequality of educational opportunities based on Grade Progression Probability (1986-2008)». Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2010s283
Santos, A. (2001). «Oportunidades educativas en Telesecundaria y factores que las condicionan». Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos (México), 31 (3).
Shavit, Y. (ed.) (2007). Stratification in higher education: A comparative study. Stanford University Press.
Shavit, Y. y Blossssfeld, H. P. (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Social inequality series. Westview Press.
Shavit, Y.; Yaish, M. y Bar-Haim, E. (2007). The persistence of persistent inequality. http://hdl.handle.net/10993/29202
Solís, P. (2012). «Desigualdad social y transición de la escuela al trabajo en la Ciudad de México». Estudios Sociológicos, 90, 641-680.
Solís, P. (2013). «Desigualdad vertical y horizontal en las transiciones educativas en México». Estudios Sociológicos xxi (número extraordinario), 63-93.
Solís, P. (2018). «La transición de la Secundaria a la Educación Media Superior en México: el difícil camino a la cobertura universal». Perfiles Educativos, 11 (159).
Teachman, J. D. (1987). «Family background, educational resources, and educational attainment». American Sociological Review, 548-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095300
Thomsen, J. P. (2015). «Maintaining inequality effectively? Access to higher education programmes in a universalist welfare state in periods of educational expansion 1984-2010». European Sociological Review, 31 (6), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv067
Torche, F. (2005). «Privatization reform and inequality of educational opportunity: The case of Chile». Sociology of education, 78 (4), 316-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070507800403
Valle Silva, N. (2004). Cambios sociales y estratificación en el Brasil contemporáneo (1945-1999). United Nations Publications, 89.
Vallet, L. A. 2007. «What can we do to improve the education of children from disadvantaged backgrounds?». En: Sorondo, M. S.; Malinvaud, E. y Lena, P. (eds.). Globalization and education: proceedings of the joint working group. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 127-155.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2018 Patricio Solis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
