Social innovation in early childhood care

Between inequality and equity in public policy

Authors

Abstract

Social innovation is a theoretical concept that has been applied to the debate on the welfare state at local level, because of its capacity to identify community initiatives with the potential to generate best practices for innovation in public policy. Despite its acknowledged innovative potential, many authors have taken a critical view of these ideas. Participation in social innovation is mostly found among middle-class individuals who are already involved in community and participatory activities. Thanks to their capacity to express their demands and suggestions, the attention they generate in the municipal sphere within local government could be considered to be a competitor to the allocation of public resources to the most vulnerable and excluded social strata of the population.
This article aims to contribute to the debate on the complex relationship between social innovation and equity, in terms of early childhood care (from 0 to 3 years old). Focusing on the case of Barcelona, it addresses the following questions: to what extent and why does access to social innovation in the care of the under-threes show socio-economic bias? How does the public’s understanding of social innovation in early childhood care differ from that of local government’s? What is the potential and what are the limitations of local public
policy to make social innovation and equity compatible?

Keywords

social innovation, public policy, early childhood education and care, social policies

References

Ajuntament de Barcelona (2021). Pla per a l’educació i la criança de la petita infància. Mesura de govern. Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona. Recuperado de https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/educacio/sites/default/files/210422_mesuradegovern_petitainfancia_def.pdf

Anderson, L. et al. (2003). «The Effectiveness of Early Childhood Development Programs. A Systematic Review». American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24 (35), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00655-4

Arampatzi, A. (2022). «Social innovation and austerity governance in Athens and Madrid: Rethinking the changing contours of policy and practice. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29 (1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211028900

Avelino, F.; Wittmayer, J. M.; Pel, B.; Weaver, P.; Dumitru, A.; Haxeltine, A. … O’Riordan, T. (2019). «Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment». Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002

Ayob, N.; Teasdale, S.; Fagan, K. (2016). «How social innovation “Came to Be”: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept». Journal of Social Policy, 45 (4), 635-653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941600009X

Baglioni, S. y Sinclair, S. (2018). Social innovation and social policy: Theory, policy and practice. Policy Press.

Blanco, I. y Gomà, R. (2020). «New Municipalism». En: Kobayashi, A. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 393-398.

Blanco, I. y León, M. (2017). «Social innovation, reciprocity and contentious politics: Facing the socio-urban crisis in Ciutat Meridiana, Barcelona». Urban Studies, 54 (9), 2.172-2.188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016659044

Brandsen, T. y Evers, A. (2019). «Social innovations in the urban context: different types of local social innovations». En: Howaldt, Jürgen; Kaletka, Christoph; Schröder, Antonius; Zirngiebl, Marthe (eds.). Atlas of Social Innovation. 2nd Volume – A World of new Practices. Múnich: Oekom Verlag GmbH.

Buuren, A. van y Loorbach, D. (2009). «Policy innovation in isolation». Public Management Review, 11 (3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902798289

Cruz, H.; Martínez, Moreno R. y Blanco, I. (2017). «Crisis, urban segregation and social innovation in Catalonia», PACO, 10 (1), 221-245. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i1p221

Eizaguirre, S. y Parés, M. (2019). «Communities making social change from below. Social innovation and democratic leadership in two disenfranchised neighbourhoods in Barcelona». Urban Research and Practice, 12 (2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1426782

Fraisse, L.; Petrella, F. y Richez-Battesti, N. (2021). «From grassroots social innovation to public experimentation in the French Local childcare system: the managerial turn». Autonomie Locali e Servizi Sociali, 44 (3), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1447/102648

Gallego, R. y Subirats, J. (2012). «Spanish Regional and Welfare Systems: Policy Innovation and Multi-level Governance». Regional and Federal Studies, 22 (3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2012.688271

Glaser, B. G. y Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

Häikiö, L.; Fraisse, L.; Adam, S.; Jolanki, O. y Knutagård, M. (2017). «The Janus face of social innovation in local welfare initiatives». En: Social Services Disrupted. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432117.00024

Howlett, M. y Tosun, J. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Policy Styles. Londres: Routledge.

Institut Infància i Adolescència (2017). Informe. Serveis socioeducatius per a la primera infància: anàlisi de models d’espais familiars. Barcelona.

http://institutinfancia.cat/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/20171106_analisicasosespaisfamiliars_informe.pdf

Kazepov, Y. (ed.). (2010). Rescaling social policies: towards multilevel governance in Europe (vol. 38). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Keller-Garganté, C. (2017). «Grupos de Crianza Compartida: Una alternativa comunitaria en la organización del cuidado en la primera infancia». Quaderns-e de l’Institut Català d’Antropologia, 22 (2), 167–182.

Knill, C. y Tuson, J. (2012). Public Policy: A New Introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Leech, N. (2009). «A typology of mixed methods research designs». Quality & Quantity, 43, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

Maestripieri, L. (2017). «Are Solidarity Purchasing Groups a social innovation? A study inspired by social forces». Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10 (3), 955-982. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i3p955

Maier, F.; Meyer, M. y Steinbereithner, M. (2016). «Non-profit organizations becoming business-like: A systemic review». Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45 (1), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014561796

Martinelli, F. (2012). «Social Innovation or Social Exclusion? Innovating Social Services in the Context of a Retrenching Welfare State». Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society, 9783642328794, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_11

Morabito, C.; Vandenbroeck, M. y Roose, R. (2013). «“The Greatest of Equalisers”: A Critical Review of International Organisations. Views on Early Childhood Care and Education». Journal of Social Policy, 42 (3), 451-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000214

Moulaert, F.; MacCallum, D.; Mehmood, A. y Hamdouch, A. (2013). «General introduction: the return of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice». En: The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Edward Elgar.

Moyson, S.; Scholten, P. y Weible, C. (2017). «Policy learning and policy change: Theorising their relations from different perspectives». Policy and Society, 36 (2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1331879

Navarro-Varas, L. (2022). «La importancia del coste de los servicios de educación y atención de la primera infancia en la ocupación laboral femenina de la metrópolis de Barcelona». Papers, 107 (3), e3076. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.3076

Oosterlynck, S.; Kazepov, Y.; Novy, A.; Cools, P.; Barberis, E.; Wukovitsch, F.; Sarius, T. y Leubolt, B. (2013). «The butterfly and the elephant: local social innovation, the welfare state and new poverty dynamics». IMPROVE Working, 13/03. Recuperado de https://ideas.repec.org/p/hdl/improv/1303.html

Palomera, David (2022). «¿Estado de bienestar para todas? Análisis de las desigualdades sociales en las solicitudes y el acceso en las guarderías públicas, y el papel de la política social para aliviarlas». Papers, 107 (3), e3068. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.3068

Pol, E. y Ville, S. (2009). «Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term?». Journal of Socio-Economics, 38 (i.), 878-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011

Tatham, M.; Hooghe, L. y Marks, G. (2021). «The territorial architecture of government». Governance, 34 (3), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12603

Thompson, M. (2021) «What’s so new about New Municipalism?». Progress in Human Geography, 45 (2), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520909480

Published

2022-07-12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.